Saturday's Symposium was a great learning experience. Lessig's keynote address drew very interesting parallels to the past, with the one about Latin standing out for me. When the masses did not speak the same language as the elite, each group became irrelevant to the other. As educators, we need to recognize where the students are coming from and work with them rather than ignoring their backgrounds and forcing our material upon them. I think I felt personally challenged because I felt like the giant Uncle Sam finger was pointing directly at me. The sessions that I attended were very informative and taught me about new technologies that I am already telling others about (zotero). The conference was designed to make people aware of what is already happening at Penn State. Drawing speakers from the branch campuses highlighted the university-wide prevalence of emerging technologies. Building in time for questions and leaving plenty of time to walk down the hallway facilitated face to face conversations that let me walk away with most of my questions answered. The designation of a hashtag for the symposium allowed the community members to share their updates with each other. This helped for all the tweets people were authoring throughout the day. I had heard about a conference at which people tweeted and had a lot of activity, but I grossly underestimated the volume of tweets that would take place over the span of eight hours. I felt that I got more out of sessions when I was able to read the realtime thoughts of others in the room. The backchannel communication also permitted me to find out what was occurring in the other rooms and provided me with laughs on several occasions. Many people made twitter contributions, but a lot of people did not - was there another backchannel or were they trying to avoid possibly being considered "rude"? The tradeoff to audience members (micro)blogging during presentations is a lack of eye contact and uncertainty for presenters. The community came together throughout the day. People were having face-to-face conversations and technology facilitated conversations. On some occasions I would speak to the person next to me, on others I would electronically send my thoughts through a tweet or a google doc. I found myself reading updates from people I have never met and vice versa. What mattered was that each person was at the symposium and communicating about the symposium. The community seemed to be largely faculty, which makes sense because they are the ones using the technology at Penn State, but I think a larger student presence would be nice. I think undergraduate education majors and minors should be encouraged to attend to provide an additional viewpoint for the benefit of all and to make them aware of new technologies for potential use in their future classrooms. Thank you to those who put the symposium together and those who presented. Thanks to Cole and Scott for having us attend.
#tltsymposium2008
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: https://blogs.psu.edu/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/149320
1 Comment
Leave a comment
Search This Blog
Important Stuff
Recent Comments
Recent Entries
- Spring 2012 Syllabus
- Course Faculty This course is co-taught by friends and colleagues, Dr. Scott McDonald and Cole Camplese. This is the…
- By Cole W. Camplese | Comments (0)
- Annotation #3
- Rogers, P.C., Graham, C.R., & Mayes, C. (2007). Cultural competence and instructional design: Exploration research into the delivery of…
- By LI-CHUN WANG | Comments (0)
- Annotation #2
- Wang, Chun-Min & Reeves, (2007).Thomas. The Meaning of Culture in Online Education. Chapter 1, The Meaning of Culture in…
- By LI-CHUN WANG | Comments (0)
Semesters
Tag Cloud
- #teamtweet
- 2007
- 2008
- 2010
- 597
- 95 theses
- academic publishing
- amazon
- announcement
- Apple
- articles
- assessment
- assignment
- audible
- becci
- blog
- blogging
- blogs
- boundaries
- boyd
- brandon
- bureaucracy
- care bears
- Christmast
- Chumby
- CI 597
- ci 597
- ci597
- ci597a
- ci597c
- CI597C
- CI597C Community
- CI597C Wenger
- class
- Class Assignments
- Class Discussion
- cliche
- cloud
- cluetrain manifeso
- CMS
- comic
- Community
- community
- community informatics
- conference
- context
- copyright
- credentials
- danah
- dawes
- definition
- definitions
- Definitions
- Definitions if Community
- Design
- design
- Digg
- Digital Commons
- digital divide
- Digital Expression
- digital literacy
- discussion
- disrupti
- disruptive technology
- Disruptive Technology
- distributed cognition
- donna
- education
- Educause
- elearning
- elements of diffusion
- ELI
- ELIAnnual08
- enterprise 2.0
- ePortfolio
- ETS
- ETS Talk
- faculty
- fiancee
- final_project
- flickr
- food
- Funny
- future
- Futures
- games
- Gladwell
- globalization
- golden slipper camp
- Good Stuff
- google apps
- google earth
- group 4
- group discussion
- harvard
- havenots
- haves
- help
- identity
- Identity
- iLife
- innovation
- instant gratification
- instructions
- interesting
- Interesting Site
- internet
- introduction
- iPad
- iPhone
- itunes u
- knowledge
- learning
- links
- lists
- liz
- LMS
- lurkers
- manyeyes
- mcluhan
- meaning
- media
- mike
- mini tour
- mobility
- mott
- multi-discipline
- New England Patriots
- nmc
- non-formal learning
- norman
- notetaker
- NPR
- nyt
- NYT
- obit for d&d creator
- one button web
- online community
- open
- open education
- openness
- outlaw
- pedagogical
- pedagogy
- Personal Introduction
- philadelphia
- photos
- PLE
- pligg
- podcast
- Podcast
- Podcasts
- portfolio
- presentation
- presidential community
- privacy
- professors
- prohibit
- psu
- PSU
- PSU Blogging
- PSU Podcasting
- psuhack
- psutlt
- publishing
- questions
- RadioLab
- rant
- reading
- Reality/Surreality
- reference
- reflection
- resource
- Resources
- response
- respose
- revere
- rheingold
- rhiengold
- rogers
- RSS
- rubenstein
- schedule
- science
- scraping
- screencast
- second life
- secondlife
- self-directed learning
- skills
- slides
- social graph
- social network
- social networking sites
- society
- sources
- spring 2010
- storytelling
- syllabus
- Syllabus
- synthesis
- Teaching
- teaching
- team 1
- Team 2
- Team 3
- team 3
- team 4
- team PC
- team2
- teamtweet
- Tech Cafe
- technology
- Technology
- tenure
- THe
- The Tipping Point
- thinking
- This American Life
- thoughts
- Thoughts
- tlt
- TLT Symposium
- tltsymposium2008
- tltsymposium2010
- tools
- Travel
- trends
- tweet talk
- tweets
- tweets youtube pic
- video
- virtual community
- virtual reality
- visualization
- web
- web 2.0
- web2
- web2.0
- wenger
- Wenger
- wesch
- wikis
- Wired
- word tree
- WordPress
- WordPress Stuff
- WVU
- Youtube
- youtube
Monthly Archives
- January 2012 (1)
- April 2010 (63)
- March 2010 (40)
- February 2010 (34)
- January 2010 (79)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (3)
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (32)
- April 2008 (98)
- March 2008 (70)
- February 2008 (216)
- January 2008 (131)
- December 2007 (27)
- November 2007 (14)
Your point about speaking the same language is valuable argument. What I wonder about is who will be forced to change. Do those who hold and maintain the current form of discourse bend to the trend of the new tongue? What are the benefits and drawbacks to each? If neither will bend, will the result be a mash-up of a blended tongue?
My other thought revolves around the back channel dialogue that was occurring on Twitter. I wondered, too, about the presenters' opinions especially when eye contact is broken. I wonder if the back channel discussion could be perceived as "talking about someone behind his/her back"...