Wenger states on page 229, "Learning cannot be designed: it can only be designed for - that is, facilitated or frustrated."How true this is! I have found as a teacher and curriculum developer both frustration with design and the freedom from design. As a teacher I designed some of my own curriculum and "used" curriculum that others had designed. I enjoyed the freedom of tailoring instruction to my particular students. Textbook curriculum fell far short of being designed for specific students. They always needed some level of modification. The freedom that I experienced designing learning activities for my students was indeed difficult but usually the most effective at stimulating learning. This point is closely related to Wenger's thoughts. Even though I was able to design learning activities tailored specifically to my students, that does not mean that the students would automatically learn. As a teacher I still had to enact the curriculum and constantly monitor and adjust it to promote student learning.
Designed Learning?
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: https://blogs.psu.edu/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/149369
3 Comments
Leave a comment
Search This Blog
Important Stuff
Recent Comments
Recent Entries
- Spring 2012 Syllabus
- Course Faculty This course is co-taught by friends and colleagues, Dr. Scott McDonald and Cole Camplese. This is the…
- By Cole W. Camplese | Comments (0)
- Annotation #3
- Rogers, P.C., Graham, C.R., & Mayes, C. (2007). Cultural competence and instructional design: Exploration research into the delivery of…
- By LI-CHUN WANG | Comments (0)
- Annotation #2
- Wang, Chun-Min & Reeves, (2007).Thomas. The Meaning of Culture in Online Education. Chapter 1, The Meaning of Culture in…
- By LI-CHUN WANG | Comments (0)
Semesters
Tag Cloud
- #teamtweet
- 2007
- 2008
- 2010
- 597
- 95 theses
- academic publishing
- amazon
- announcement
- Apple
- articles
- assessment
- assignment
- audible
- becci
- blog
- blogging
- blogs
- boundaries
- boyd
- brandon
- bureaucracy
- care bears
- Christmast
- Chumby
- CI 597
- ci 597
- ci597
- ci597a
- ci597c
- CI597C
- CI597C Community
- CI597C Wenger
- class
- Class Assignments
- Class Discussion
- cliche
- cloud
- cluetrain manifeso
- CMS
- comic
- Community
- community
- community informatics
- conference
- context
- copyright
- credentials
- danah
- dawes
- definition
- definitions
- Definitions
- Definitions if Community
- Design
- design
- Digg
- Digital Commons
- digital divide
- Digital Expression
- digital literacy
- discussion
- disrupti
- disruptive technology
- Disruptive Technology
- distributed cognition
- donna
- education
- Educause
- elearning
- elements of diffusion
- ELI
- ELIAnnual08
- enterprise 2.0
- ePortfolio
- ETS
- ETS Talk
- faculty
- fiancee
- final_project
- flickr
- food
- Funny
- future
- Futures
- games
- Gladwell
- globalization
- golden slipper camp
- Good Stuff
- google apps
- google earth
- group 4
- group discussion
- harvard
- havenots
- haves
- help
- identity
- Identity
- iLife
- innovation
- instant gratification
- instructions
- interesting
- Interesting Site
- internet
- introduction
- iPad
- iPhone
- itunes u
- knowledge
- learning
- links
- lists
- liz
- LMS
- lurkers
- manyeyes
- mcluhan
- meaning
- media
- mike
- mini tour
- mobility
- mott
- multi-discipline
- New England Patriots
- nmc
- non-formal learning
- norman
- notetaker
- NPR
- nyt
- NYT
- obit for d&d creator
- one button web
- online community
- open
- open education
- openness
- outlaw
- pedagogical
- pedagogy
- Personal Introduction
- philadelphia
- photos
- PLE
- pligg
- podcast
- Podcast
- Podcasts
- portfolio
- presentation
- presidential community
- privacy
- professors
- prohibit
- psu
- PSU
- PSU Blogging
- PSU Podcasting
- psuhack
- psutlt
- publishing
- questions
- RadioLab
- rant
- reading
- Reality/Surreality
- reference
- reflection
- resource
- Resources
- response
- respose
- revere
- rheingold
- rhiengold
- rogers
- RSS
- rubenstein
- schedule
- science
- scraping
- screencast
- second life
- secondlife
- self-directed learning
- skills
- slides
- social graph
- social network
- social networking sites
- society
- sources
- spring 2010
- storytelling
- syllabus
- Syllabus
- synthesis
- Teaching
- teaching
- team 1
- Team 2
- Team 3
- team 3
- team 4
- team PC
- team2
- teamtweet
- Tech Cafe
- technology
- Technology
- tenure
- THe
- The Tipping Point
- thinking
- This American Life
- thoughts
- Thoughts
- tlt
- TLT Symposium
- tltsymposium2008
- tltsymposium2010
- tools
- Travel
- trends
- tweet talk
- tweets
- tweets youtube pic
- video
- virtual community
- virtual reality
- visualization
- web
- web 2.0
- web2
- web2.0
- wenger
- Wenger
- wesch
- wikis
- Wired
- word tree
- WordPress
- WordPress Stuff
- WVU
- Youtube
- youtube
Monthly Archives
- January 2012 (1)
- April 2010 (63)
- March 2010 (40)
- February 2010 (34)
- January 2010 (79)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (3)
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (32)
- April 2008 (98)
- March 2008 (70)
- February 2008 (216)
- January 2008 (131)
- December 2007 (27)
- November 2007 (14)
i think this is why reading wenger is so appropriate for this course- the affordances of web 2.0 technologies invite, expand, and strengthen the design of student-in-community centered curriculum.
Your last point Steve about how tailoring the learning activities still does not mean that students will automatically learn is also appropriate with the affordances of web 2.0 technologies. Learning can happen in web 2.0 technologies but it is not necessary. My question then is if adding a "teacher" or "facilitator" to guarantee that learning occurs is taking away from the authentic learning experience that the web 2.0 technologies afford?
I always felt jealous of the characters in the Matrix. All the had to do to learn something was to 'upload' the the program 'designed' for the chosen task. If learning/teaching was only so easy. Write you curriculum, upload it into each student, and smile at how good a teacher you are. Will technology ever get us past the need for social learning and the need for 'instruction'? Would it be the same?