Christopher Long, Associate Professor of Philosophy

chris_reflected.jpegIn Plato's dialogue Gorgias, Socrates claims to be one of the only Athenians to practice the true art of politics. As is well known, Socrates haunted the public places in Athens looking for young people with whom he could converse. During these discussions, Socrates was intent on turning the attention of those he encountered toward the question of the good and the just. It is difficult to understate the lasting political power these dialogues have had over the course of time. Yet the emergence of social Web 2.0 technologies opens new possibilities for this ancient practice of politics, which Socrates fittingly called in the Gorgias, a "techne," or art.

"Socratic Politics in Digital Dialogue" is designed to explore the opportunities digital expression offers to enhance, deepen, expand and promote my academic scholarship in philosophy by focusing on issues related to the Socratic practice of politics. I will work closely with the TLT staff to brainstorm ideas, produce digital content, develop new and enhance existing tools of digital expression in order to model a practice of using Web 2.0 technologies as a mode of philosophical research that is also socially and politically engaged. The point will not be to research the impact of technology on philosophy, but to explore the possibility of pursuing rigorous academic philosophical research using digital media and innovative technology.

The main outcome of the project will be an integrated academic digital profile that serves to strengthen my scholarship and teaching in philosophy. One important dimension of this profile will be the creation of a digital community around some of the central philosophical ideas that animate my teaching and scholarship.

You can learn more about this project by visiting the ETS Wiki.

My summer as a Teaching and Learning with Technology Faculty Fellow began with a general sense of purpose without a clear idea of precisely how the goals I set for myself would be achieved. The purpose was to perform scholarship using digital media. Specifically, I wanted to begin work in earnest on a research project focusing on the nature of Socratic politics as depicted in the Platonic dialogues. The idea was not only to begin reading and thinking about the enigmatic appearance of Socrates as he practices politics in the dialogues, but also to use digital media to expose my thinking to a wider audience early in the research program.

Happily, Cole Camplese, Director of Education Technology Services, surrounded me with a very talented team of educators -- Allan Gyorke, Matt Meyer and Ryan Wetzel. During our first meeting, we talked in some detail about the concerns I had that my nascent work might suffer by being exposed too early to a wider audience.  We thought about the different sorts of communities I could reach with different types of media and we devised a flexible strategy to begin work.  

The key to the success of the project was the decision to follow a suggestion made by Allan Gyorke that we make podcasting central to the project. My immediate reaction to this was, to be honest, negative. I had already done some podcasting on my own and, well, I just did not like to hear the sound of my recorded voice. However, once my team lent me the courage to speak without thinking about the fact that my voice was being recorded, I began to recognize the power of this medium for my project.

The Power of Podcasting
The reason podcasting turned out to be so important to the project was that it afforded me the opportunity to reach out explicitly to colleagues within Penn State and in the larger academic community and invite them into an safe and comfortable space in which ideas could be risked, challenged, discussed and revised without calcifying into written text. In short, with podcasting, I was able to tap into the dynamic dialogue between living voices that often fails to translate in written form. If writing allows us to reflect and formulate, edit and craft, oral expression allows us to play with ideas, to test and challenge them in dynamic relation to another.

In a way, by choosing podcasting as a medium, I was affirming something Socratic rather than Platonic, for Socrates spoke but did not write, while Plato wrote even if he chose a style (the dialogue form) that sought to articulate something of the play of spoken dialogue.

Once I began to recognize that podcasting offered me a medium through to practice dialogue with others even as I sought to think about the powerful political implications of dialogue itself, I focused my attention on developing the Digital Dialogue, a podcast dedicated to cultivating the excellences of dialogue in a digital age. 


The Digital Dialogue
The Digital Dialogue began as an attempt to articulate the excellences or virtues that must be cultivated if dialogue is to have a politically transformative effect. While the podcast is rooted in the Ancient Greek tradition of virtue ethics and dialogue, it has expanded into the area of contemporary political and social theory. As it grows, I expect the Digital Dialogue to engage a diverse set of thinkers concerned with thinking about the political possibilities opened to us by dialogue facilitated by social media technologies.
  
I imagine there are many ways to measure the success of this podcast. One might look at the number of people who subscribe to it over iTunesU or the number who have visited the Socratic Politics blog looking for the link to a specific episode. Or one might measure the number of links posted back to the blog or the extent to which other universities have highlighted it on their website. Although I have not yet tried to track down the statistics, we have seen the podcast picked up by Boston College, Colby College, Rhodes College, and the Institute for Conflict Resolution and Analysis at George Mason College.

For now, however, the way I choose to measure the success of the podcast is by the degree to which it has pushed my research in directions I had not anticipated. In dialogue with others, my own thinking has developed and changed and I am much further along in my thinking about the nature and practice of Socratic politics than I would have been had I spent the summer reading alone in the library. 

For this, I would like to thank everyone in TLT at Penn State and especially Cole Camplese, Allan Gyorke, Matt Meyer, Ryan Wetzel, Brad Kozlek, Pat Besong, George Webster, Chris Stubbs and Zach Zidic. 
When I began my summer faculty fellowship here at ETS, I did not think that podcasting would play a big role in the project as a whole. However, Allan Gyorke convinced me that the podcast would be a great medium to do the sort of things I wanted to do with my scholarship. 

Over the course of the last few weeks, my team and I have produced a number of podcasts that center on the excellences associated with digital dialogue. Our work raised my comfort level with the technology of podcasting and with the sound of my own voice digitally recorded and now I have started to move out into a wider academic community to produce podcasts of my own with students and scholars at diverse locations using Skype Recorder.

One of the main goals of my project was to expose my research to others earlier in the creative process to see if new ideas and directions of research emerged from that exposure.  Originally I thought I would do this with blog posts, and I have to some degree.  However, the dynamic, probing, tentative and, indeed, dialogical nature of the verbal exchanges captured on podcasts actually seems to be the more natural medium for this attempt to cultivate a cross-pollination of ideas.

Check out the Digital Dialogue Podcast on the Socratic Politics in Digital Dialogue blog or visit us on iTunesU.

Creating Cross Pollination

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

In recent weeks there has been a lot of discussion about how to create cross pollination among the faculty fellows. This week's big accomplishment for our groups has been to arrange a joint summit with Chris Long's group. The Fellows are also scheduled to be on a panel for the Summer Camp, but I hope there are more opportunities.

When we compared notes on projects, it definitely seemed like there was a lot of overlap. Allan asked what we thought the common theme was, and on further reflection, I think it's that we all are working towards a common vision of the Internet being a place where anyone, anywhere can contribute to the knowledge of the community (and I count brisk discussion as an important part of that).

Ellysa Cahoy has been focusing on new information literacy - which not only allow students to filter the enourmous amount of content out there but hopefully will allow them to make intelligent contributions. Carla Zembal-Saul has been focusing on student portfolios, which is an important skill to allow us to organize and share what we are learning with the world. Chris Long has been focusing on how the Internet can enable discussions of the type practiced by Socrates...but with a potentially much larger stage. And Stuart Selber has been focusing on how technical writers need to prepare for a world where users may be providing "official instruction" on a product.

I think there's been lots of interesting discussion going on and it's giving a lot of us a rare opportunity to think about how our jobs really can impact Penn State and the larger world. As I said, I hope there are more opportunities for cross pollination out there for us and the Learning Design community. These instructors have a lot to teach us.

If you want to sample what we are thinking, I would recommend Mary Janzen's last blog entry on technical writing. As always, I find it very interesting reading.

In the demonstration of Google Wave, they talk about the metaphor of a "hosted conversation." Whatever the ultimate impact of Wave is for the future, as I begin my TLT faculty fellowship for a project on Socratic Politics in Digital Dialogue, I am struck by the recognition that what the  Wave speaks to at its very core is something deeply human and ancient: the need to engage in dialogue with one another in ever new ways that open new possibilities for human being together.  

Google Wave is potentially revolutionary because it is the latest articulation of the human drive to communicate with one another as we move through and attempt to come to terms with the world in which we live.

I am particularly excited about Google Wave because of the central metaphor in which it is rooted: the dynamics of dialogical conversation.

There is one other point I would want to make as I begin to think about my own project: there is something significant about the way Google is introducing the Wave.  They are inviting people to participate in its development, which means they are, at least theoretically, taking seriously the central metaphor in which the phenomenon of the Wave is rooted: the creative possibilities opened by and in dialogue.

If I am going to open my research into the meaning and nature of Socratic Politics at this early and embryonic stage, I will need to trust the possibilities of dialogue and accountability; I will need to perform research in dialogue.

ETS Team: Chris

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Each Faculty Fellow is assigned a group of interested staff from ETS. The team will meet weekly with the Fellow and work through ideas and activities. The team members assigned to Chris are:

  • Allan Gyorke
  • Matt Meyer
  • Ryan Wetzel

Search This Blog

Full Text  Tag

Recent Assets

  • Recording Narration
  • chris_reflected.jpeg
  • ff_header_02.jpg
Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.